-
Coming Straight From Austin Texas With New Single “Pretend” - January 9, 2021
-
Travis Scott Releases His First Single of 2019 [VIDEO] - October 4, 2019
-
Lil Kim Releasing First Album In 14 Years - October 4, 2019
-
Three Charged With Providing Mac Miller With Deadly Drugs - October 4, 2019
-
Lizzo Makes History With New Billboard Record - September 24, 2019
-
Rap-A-Lot Record’s J Prince Has A Lot To Say About 6ix9ine - September 24, 2019
-
Philly Approves Meek Mill Weekend - March 14, 2019
-
T.I.’s Sister, Precious Harris Had Died - February 22, 2019
-
Jussie Smollett Remove From Empire’s Final Episodes - February 22, 2019
-
Drake & Jennifer Lopez Have Been Spending Quite Some Time Together - December 21, 2016
Foxy Brown Suing New York City For $100 Millon
A couple days after having a restraining order violation charge dropped against her, Foxy Brown is now seeking legal retribution of her own.
The restraining order was originally filed due to an earlier charge, initiated by Arlene Raymond, Foxy Brown’s neighbor, in 2007. Brown allegedly threw and hit Ms. Raymond with a Blackberry. The artist was arrested and released on $50,000 bail.
Now, the plaintiff, Raymond, claims Brown became very agitated towards her for staring in her direction. Brown proceeded to walk up to her and begin yelling. Ms. Raymond then claims that Brown “bent over and thrust her buttocks, and said, ‘kiss my ass’”. Brown’s manager on the other hand claims Brown was making her way to her car, when the neighbor initiated an altercation.
Regardless of what happened, the ‘mooning’ case was later dismissed when Ms. Raymond refused to testify. On July 12th, Justice John Walsh cleared Foxy Brown of the misdemeanor charge of violating an order of protection.
The legal battle may now switch sides, this time with Brown in the plaintiff’s seat. Her lawyer, Salvatore Strazullo, told the New York Post that his client, Brown, plans to sue the ADA, Assistant District Attorney’s office, for $100 million in damages.
Strazullo said the initial charges were “malicious”, and the ADA should never have gone after his client, Brown, in the first place. “Do we want our tax dollars going for this?” Strazullo commented.